This is the fourth study we will be looking at from Making a Profile, as part of your OCR A2 Forensic Psychology course. It is further categorised into both ‘case study.’
Continue reading Canter – John Duffy Case Study ‘The Railway Rapist’
This is the third study we will be looking at from Making a Profile, as part of your OCR A2 Forensic Psychology course. It is further categorised into ‘bottom-up.’
This is the first study that we will be looking at for the After a guilty verdict section of A2 Forensic Psychology, which is the 4th and final section. Gillis & Nafekh (2005) is further categorised into the sub-section ‘Imprisonment.’
This is the second study we will be looking at from Making a Profile, as part of your OCR A2 Forensic Psychology course.
The background this study is the same as Hazelwood and Douglas (1980). It is highly recommended that you look that these two studies in series, first studying Hazelwood and Douglas (1980) because this study is an evaluation of Hazelwood and Douglas (1980)
The background study for this theory, is Holmes and Holmes (1989).
Firstly, what is profiling? Offender or criminal profiling is simply the attempt to predict and create the likely traits and behaviours of an offender of a crime. The likelihood is that you already could begin to have a guess at the type of person that committed a crime. For example three women are found strangled and sexually assaulted at three different, but closely located train stations. It is more than likely that a male committed these offences. Criminal profiling done by professionals is in essence what we just did, but it goes into more depth.
Holmes and Holmes (1989) identified 3 aims of profiling:
The Guðjónsson Suggestibility Scale was created by Gísli Gudjonsson, a Professor Emeritus at King’s College London and an Honorary consultant Continue reading The Guðjónsson Suggestibility Scale